ExxonMobil

Officer Denies Motion To Rehear Megaloads Case
Officer Denies Motion To Rehear Megaloads Case
Officer Denies Motion To Rehear Megaloads Case
A hearing officer has rejected a motion to reconsider his decision in favor of a plan by ExxonMobil to haul massive loads of equipment along a scenic highway in north central Idaho. Former state judge Duff McKee rejected the request Monday filed by critics of Exxon's plans to ship the oversized loads along U.S. Highway 12.
Misleading Information On Critters Harmed In Oil Spill
Misleading Information On Critters Harmed In Oil Spill
Misleading Information On Critters Harmed In Oil Spill
The damage to wildlife because of the ExxonMobil oil spill in the Yellowstone River seems small. Only about 20 critters have been observed covered with oil, but that count is misleading according to wildlife biologist Doug Inkley at the National Wildlife Federation.
A Call For Full Discloser
A Call For Full Discloser
A Call For Full Discloser
Environmental groups are calling for full disclosure from Exxon to determine whether tar sands corrosion played a role in the Yellowstone oil spill. Dirty fuels campaigner at Friends of the Earth, Alex Moore says tar sands oil can corrode pipelines more quickly.
Foes Appeal Hearing Officer Ruling On Megaloads
Foes Appeal Hearing Officer Ruling On Megaloads
Foes Appeal Hearing Officer Ruling On Megaloads
A group of north Idaho residents has asked a hearing judge to reconsider his ruling in favor of ExxonMobil's plans to haul dozens of oversized loads of equipment along U.S. Highway 12. Last month, hearing officer Duff McKee handed the oil company a victory when he recommended that the Idaho Transportation Department issue travel permits for the shipments.